Getting Started 2.01 (beta)

Comments on Blogging to Learn by Anne Bartlett-Bragg and Educational Blogging by Stephen Downes

I think I’m beginning to get it!  The set articles, Blogging to Learn and Educational Blogging were both enlightening.  The latter was more so, and revealed a source of my own confusion:  Until reading this, I had assumed that a blog was a log in the sense of dated entries (Captain’s log….) of what had been happening, placed on the web.  If it is that, then it might be useful, but so would a personal journal, and why make it public?  But the article revealed the other facet; a weblog as a log of web sites.  That seems a much more interesting thing to share: Useful links with anotated comments.  If you find a blog like that it could be really useful.

     My main reflection form this is that I didn’t know enough about blogs in the first place.  So, I think a good place to start is Stephen Downes’ idea of beginning by reading blogs, rather than starting with writing before really reflecting on the nature of the medium. In that sense, I would perhaps include a preliminary stage of “blog reading and analysis” before beginning Bartlett-Bragg’s 5-Stage Blogging Process.

     The other interesting point that Downes made was about the legal implications of blogs and the resulting restrictions. 

Getting Started 2.0

Getting started is actually a false post.  I’ve just redesigned the site (made it easier – for me to manage) and rewrittern what I wrote during the initial day.  This is another issue with technology.  It doesn’t come naturally. or maybe it does to some people? Anyway, the thing is, in my case I’m learning about issues relating to Web 2.0 and, at the same time, learning how to blog.  For example, I spent a long time trying to include a video in a post, failed and left it for another day.  Today, I haven’t had time, so I’ll make it a priority for the next post. Meanwhile, if anybody wants to let me know via a comment, feel free.

Getting started

Finally getting started blogging.  Mixed feelings about the whole enterprise. If one of the characteristics of Web 2.0 is many-to-many, as oppposed to the 1.0 model of one-to-many, it makes me wonder whether we’ve all really got something interesting to say. 

That, and the issue of veracity are what I find interesting about Web 2.0.